To liven up the debates, should Jerry Springer host them?

[DeepDiver]

The right side>> haahaaahhaaa. I love it

[tlb]

for sure.....that would be great fun to watch.

[Mentat]

No, Steven Colbert or Jon Stewart. Then I would feel sorry for the candidates. But it will force them to think on their feet.

[joe4912004]

Jerry Springer should be incarcerated for insighting and empowering the chronically stupid.

[Phil C]

That isn't a bad idea. Next they can take away the podium and give all the candidates boxing gloves.

[The Right Side]

I could see the Clinton's on the Jerry Springer Show but I don't see him hosting the debates.

[Razor 6]

yes..good idea

[irk.some101]

"Live, from a trailer park! Republican candidates and the cross-dressing pedophile meth-heads who love them!"

[tehabwa]

The purpose of the debates is so we can see and hear all these people and so decide who we want to vote for.If you want to watch fights and wrestling and such, there are lots of shows that have them -- try the sports channel or "reality" shows.Those of us who actually have brains don't watch debates because they're "lively" but because we want to understand who the candidates are and what they stand for.Also, please never vote. Do the country a big favor.

[allen a]

I was under the impression he was hosting the democrat debates.